Infrastructure Investment Deficit
Recent research from various associations in Canada shows
that there is a growing infrastructure investment deficit occurring in many sectors. This
results in deteriorating infrastructure and escalating costs since the longer
roads and buildings remain in a state of disrepair, the higher the costs to
refurbish or replace.
The Canadian Council for Public-Private Partnerships believes
that public-private partnerships are one proven method to begin addressing the
infrastructure backlog and utilize the expertise and capital available from the
private sector.
An Interview with Saeed
Mirza, Professor Emeritus, Civil Engineering & Applied Mechanics, McGill
University
CCPPP interviewed Dr. Mirza in February 2009 about
his opinions on the progress on reducing the infrastructure deficit,
and incidentally, how PPP may play a role in addressing the problems
with conventional approaches to infrastructure development in
Canada.
FEDERAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING
The 2009 Budget Implementation Act received Royal Assent on March
12, 2009. Many of the budget provisions were designed to infuse
capital in infrastructure and other economic stimulus programs
quickly, most within 2009 and 2010. While there were no significant
new initiatives related specifically to P3, there were several
infrastructure-related provisions that may impact P3 project funding
in the next two years.
The 2009 Budget reiterated the existing funding for the Building
Canada Fund ($8.8B), and Border Crossings Fund ($2.1B), Asia-Pacific
Gateway and Corridor Initiative ($1B), and Public-Private
Partnerships Fund ($1.26B). The 2009 Budget also noted that PPP
Canada Inc., the Crown Corporation charged with administering the P3
Fund, is “planning an initial call for applications
to the fund in 2009–10.” For more information on the existing
Building Canada Fund, Gateways & Border Crossings Fund and P3 Fund,
go to:
www.infc.gc.ca/ip-pi/bcip-picc/bcip-picc-eng.html. You can also
view the
Building Canada e-newsletter for current details.
CANADA'S
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM
At Council of the Federation meeting in August 2005, Canada's
territorial and provincial premiers identified Canada's transportation system
"as vital to promoting economic growth, international competitiveness and the
best standard of living for all Canadians." The report stemming from the meeting
outlined several policy recommendations that would foster better infrastructure
development and management. It also highlighted a number of investment gaps in
the sector:
-
A federal/provincial/territorial task
force on urban transportation estimated in 2005 that
infrastructure investment needs for Canada's urban transit is at
least $23 billion over the next few years. Investment needs for
urban roads and bridges is much higher—$66 billion over 10 years.
(1)
-
As far back as 1998, the Council of
Ministers of Transportation estimated that investment needs on the
National Highway System were over $17 billion. Since that time,
the NHS has been extended and costs have increased. (1)
-
Using preliminary estimates, provinces
and territories have identified the need for approximately $97
billion in capital investment in transportation priorities over
the next 10 years. (1)
In the Spring of 2004, the Government of Ontario held
consultation sessions to obtain feedback on its "Discussion Paper on
Infrastructure Financing and Procurement". It was the Government's
first step in developing a long-term plan to address Ontario's
infrastructure deficit. In April 2004, CCPPP submitted a Position Paper
to the Minister of Public Infrastructure Renewal, Hon. David Caplan,
outlining the benefits of using public-private partnerships to
deliver much-needed infrastructure in Ontario. In July 2004, the Ministry
released "Building a Better Tomorrow - Infrastructure Planning,
Financing and Procurement Framework for Ontario's Public Sector".
Ogilvy Renault prepared a brief on the framework for CCPPP.
In May
2005, Minister Caplan announced the formation of the Ontario
Infrastructure Projects Corporation, which will focus on
"alternative financing and procurement". On May 25, 2005,
the Ministry of Infrastructure Renewal issued its 5-Year
Infrastructure Plan entitled "ReNew Ontario", which includes $2.3
billion in major alternative financing and procurement projects.
For more information on the Government's Framework, go to the
Ministry of Public Infrastructure Renewal website at:
http://www.pir.gov.on.ca/english/aboutpir/publications/BBT-Framework_EN.pdf
SELECTED RESEARCH
Below are selected resources and statistics on Canada's
infrastructure investment deficit.
-
If the current level of
infrastructure under-investment is allowed to continue in Canada, the deficit
could balloon to $1 trillion in 60 years. (2)
-
Deferring maintenance (or not
performing repairs at all) leads to much higher rates of deterioration and
repair bills that can equal the cost of the original asset. (2)
The municipal infrastructure gap
as a percentage of national GDP has grown from 2.7% in 1984 to
5.0% in 2002. (3)
The municipal infrastructure gap
is growing by $2 billion per year and the federal gas tax (when
fully mature) will provide $2 billion per year. This only
stabilizes the gap at roughly $60 billion. (3)
More than 80% of foreign
multinational executives surveyed indicated that the poor state of business
infrastructure adversely affected Canada as a destination for foreign direct
investment. One of the key concerns is the state of the country’s physical
infrastructure. (4)
Canada's infrastructure gap is
estimated to be between $50 billion and $125 billion, which is 6-10 times the
level of all current annual government infrastructure budgets combined.(5)
Canada's large western cities (Vancouver, Edmonton, Calgary, Saskatoon, Regina,
Edmonton, Winnipeg) reported an infrastructure deficit of $564 million in 2003.
(6)
The current cost estimate to
rehabilitate Canada's civil infrastructure system at the municipal level is $57
billion, which only represents 70% of Canada's total civil infrastructure (7)
-
We have already used 79% of our
infrastructure's life expectancy (7)
(7)
(7)
$20.7 billion is
required for transit system infrastructure for the period
2006-2010, with $9.1 billion (44%) of that required just to keep
current systems in a state of good repair (8)
The trends evident
in comparing the infrastructure needs between 1999 and 2006
suggest transit infrastructure needs have increased 144% from $8.5
billion to $20.7 billion but are now stabilizing. (8)
-
A recent study of 35 key Ontario
municipalities found they needed to spend more than $700 million on road
reconstruction while actual spending amounted to only $255 million (9)
45% of their roads required work, with 10% needing
immediate repair (9)
Drivers in Southern Ontario are now
having to spend an average of almost $2,000 over the life of their
vehicles in repairing damage to their cars caused by poor road
conditions (10)
|
ONTARIO SCHOOLS |
back to top |
- The investment required to return Ontario’s current water
and wastewater systems to a state of good repair - and
maintain that condition for the indefinite future - will be
between $30 and $40 billion over the next 15 years (12)
|
| SOURCES |
back to top |
| (1) |
Council of the Federation, "Looking to
the Future: A Plan for Investing in Canada's Transportation
System" (December 2005).
View report. |
| (2) |
Dr. M. Saeed Mirza, "The Urgency of Addressing Canada's
Infrastructure" (November 22, 2004).
View the presentation. |
| (3) |
Donald Drummond, "Is There a Role for P3s in Canada's
Towns & Cities?" (November 22, 2004).
View the presentation. |
| (4) |
The Conference Board of Canada, "Open For Business? Canada’s
Foreign Direct Investment Challenge" (June 2004). Available at:
www.conferenceboard.ca and click on "Boardwise". |
| (5) |
TD Bank Financial Group, "Mind the Gap: Finding the Money to
Upgrade Canada's Aging Public Infrastructure" (May 2004).
View report. |
| (6) |
Canada West Foundation, "No Time to be Timid: Addressing
Infrastructure Deficits in the Western Big Six" (February 2004).
Available at: www.cwf.ca. |
| (7) |
The Canadian Society of Civil
Engineering, "Civil Infrastructure Systems Technology Roadmap 2003-2013"
(June 2003). View report. |
| (8) |
The Canadian Urban Transit Association,
"Report
on a Survey of Transit Infrastructure Needs for the Period 2006-2010"
(April 2006). Available at:
www.cutaactu.ca/sites/cutaactu.ca/files/InfraNeeds2006.pdf |
| (9) |
Ontario Roads Coalition, "Ontario's Municipal Roads 2001".
Available at:
www.worstroads.ca |
| (10) |
Canadian Automobile Association |
| (11) |
Globe and Mail, "Funding plan to fix schools 'a great
start'" (May 26, 2004). |
| (12) |
Expert Panel on Water and Wastewater
Strategy, "Watertight: The Case for Change in Ontario's Water
and Wastewater Sector" (July 2005). Available at:
www.waterpanel.ontario.ca |
|
 |
|